Review queue

2026-05-11 Special (Open) Council

3 unresolved
03:16

3:16-3:34

Context: 2:34-4:16
insufficient_evidence
Provisional
Unknown spk_0
Transcript clue
No useful clue
Visual clue
Corporate Officer
Current transcript segment
Unknown spk_0 · 2:34-4:16
OK Good evening everyone I'm going TO CALL The SPECIAL Open uh Council Meeting TO uh ORDER Uh All members OF Council uh present in The room Councillor Thompson Councillor Riddle myself Councillor Newton Councillor Paltiello and Councillor King Uh We expect TO see Councillor Graham uh around 7 this evening With That uh I will begin by respectfully acknowledg...
Previous identified speaker
No nearby identified segment found.
Following identified speaker
Robert Thompson · 4:33-7:22
Thank you um TO The Mayor No There you go OK thank you Uh staff provided a REPORT TO Council At The April 27th Regular Council Meeting That provided proposed Criteria and Evaluation weighings TO Establish The Evaluation standards For The request For proposals For The Disposition OF 1903 Mount Union Crossroad At That Meeting Council approved a motion For sta...

No visual, transcript, or voice evidence reached the auto-resolve threshold.

15:07

15:07-15:25

Context: 14:55-15:37
insufficient_evidence
Provisional
Paltio
Transcript clue
Peltio
Visual clue
Corporate Officer
Current transcript segment
Needs review · 14:55-15:37
I I don't think Pardon me just taking on That point I I don't think At The Concept level necessarily If If it's If it's just a Concept coming back as a response TO The RFP um I I don't feel That a a reimbursement OF either successful or not successful applicants is is really necessary I think It can be a High-level and early risk That gets taken in The in T...
Previous identified speaker
Central Saanich Encoder · 14:14-14:42
um through The mayor um It was actually recommended initially by our Procurement consultant um as a best practice in a uh procure in an RFP um uh With a Project OF this size and uh initially We did not make That Recommendation uh but because The scope could potentially change uh Uh It was a Recommendation That We uh thought We should make TO Council At this...
Following identified speaker
Thompson Councillor · 16:20-16:33
Uh thank you Um so We do have a budget uh For um The Municipal Hall um uh Redevelopment and so It would It would come out OF That um uh budget OK

No visual, transcript, or voice evidence reached the auto-resolve threshold.

Voice candidates
Thompson Councillor 0.094
19:03

19:03-19:21

Context: 18:49-19:35
insufficient_evidence
Provisional
Matanowic With
Transcript clue
King Thank
Visual clue
King
Current transcript segment
Needs review · 18:49-19:35
Thank you uh thank you Councillor Thompson So through The RFP one thing That We We will ask For uh With The Concept is an Engagement strategy and what we'll ask For is That Engagement TO be undertaken during The Development Permit Process So That Process is a is a Council Process So as part OF That we'll have a requirement That The applicant hold um you kno...
Previous identified speaker
Riddle · 17:29-17:51
Um I did submit a letter For The May 4th Meeting in which I talked about The Process TO a degree When is The time I know we're talking about right now in terms OF The point systems Is there an opportunity uh during this Meeting TO raise issues such as The timing OF public input
Following identified speaker
Riddle · 19:36-20:16
My concern uh as I expressed is That I I'm not happy With looking At major Development proposals during The summer months In particular TO me any public uh input on this Process should not happen during August as suggested in The uh schedule in a recent REPORT but should not occur until after The Labor Day weekend when people are home from vacations and set...

No visual, transcript, or voice evidence reached the auto-resolve threshold.

Voice candidates
Riddle 0.182